Herschel Observers' Manual

Announcement of Opportunity for Key Programmes

HERSCHEL-HSC-DOC-0876, version 2.1
2007 August 1

Table of Contents

Preface
1. The Observatory
1.1. Spacecraft overview
1.1.1. Herschel Extended Payload Module
1.1.2. The Service Module (SVM)
1.1.3. Spacecraft Axes definition.
1.2. Spacecraft orbit and operation
1.3. Sky visibility
1.4. Herschel pointing performance
1.4.1. Pointing accuracy definitions
1.4.2. Pointing performance
1.4.3. Gyro propagation mode
2. Space Environment
2.1. Background radiation
2.1.1. Telescope background
2.1.2. Instruments
2.1.3. Celestial background
2.2. Radiation environment
2.3. Source confusion
2.4. Straylight
3. Ground Segment
3.1. Ground Segment Overview
3.2. From proposal to observations
3.3. Mission planning and execution of the observations
3.4. Data processing and products
3.5. Quality control
3.6. Calibration observations
4. Mission phases
4.1. Launch and Early Orbit Operations
4.2. Commissioning Phase
4.3. PV Phase
4.4. Science demonstration
4.5. Routine operations
4.6. Post-Operations Phase
4.7. Archive Phase
5. Overview of scientific capabilities
5.1. General aspects
5.2. Photometry with Herschel
5.2.1. Instrument capabilities
5.2.2. Using SPIRE and PACS in parallel
5.3. Spectroscopy with Herschel
6. Observing with Herschel
6.1. Introduction to HSpot
6.1.1. Will HSpot run on my computer?
6.1.2. Proposal presentation
6.2. Types of target
6.2.1. Fixed targets
6.2.2. Moving targets
6.3. AOT entry
6.4. Constraints on observations
6.4.1. Chopper avoidance angles
6.4.2. Fixed time observations
6.4.3. Concatenation of observations
6.5. Limiting length of observations
6.5.1. Fixed targets
6.5.2. Moving targets
6.6. Observing overheads
6.6.1. Telescope slew time
6.6.2. Scans and rasters
6.6.3. Internal calibration
6.6.4. Constrained observations
6.7. Details to take into account in the observation of moving targets
6.7.1. Background and PA variations
6.7.2. Satellite visibility
7. Acronyms
8. Acknowledgements
References
9. Change record

List of Figures

1.1. The Herschel spacecraft has a modular design. On the left, facing the "warm" side and on the right, facing the "cold" side of the spacecraft, the middle image names the major components.
1.2. The Herschel telescope flight model.
1.3. The Herschel cryostat.
1.4. The Herschel service module.
1.5. Herschel s/c axes (from [RD1])
1.6. Left: Position of the Lagrange points for the Sun-Earth/Moon system. L2 lies 1.5 million kilometres from Earth. Right: An example of a Lissajous orbit around L2. The orbit x and y-axis are as shown in the plot on the left, the z-axis is normal to paper.
1.7. A 3D representation of a large halo orbit around L2. The Earth is located at (0,0,0). Red tracks are the projection on the three orthogonal planes of the 3D orbit (blue track).
1.8. Top: The sky visibility across the sky as a fraction of the total hours through the Herschel mission, represented as a colour scale (shown at right) where black represents 30% visibility and white represents permanent sky visibility. Bottom: sky visibility for two sample dates. Shadowed areas represent inaccessible sky areas.
1.9. Diagram of the Herschel/Planck avionics.
2.1. Brightness of the night sky, excluding contribution of the extragalactic background (from [RD5], adapted from Leinert et al. 1998, A&A, 127, 1). The spectral range covered by the PACS and SPIRE instruments of the Herschel Space Observatory are indicated. Atmospheric contributors, affecting ground-based observation in the optical and NIR, have been also displayed.
2.2. Cumulative (left) and differential (right) 24 μm number counts from [RD10]. The differential counts have been normalised to an Euclidean slope, dN/dSν Sν-2.5. The curves show predictions from different recent models, including that from Lagache et al. 2003.
3.1. Herschel Space Observatory Ground Segment
5.1. The Herschel Focal Plane.
6.1. Position angle variation for sources on the ecliptic and at the ecliptic pole, in the zone of permanent sky visibility. For sources at intermediate ecliptic latitude the annual range of variation of PA will be between these two extremes.
6.2. An illustrative example. The position angle variation for PACS for an object at an ecliptic latitude of 59.5 degrees, close to the point of permanent visibility. The horizontal position is PA=000 degrees. The plotted positions of the PACS imaging detectors are for a hypothetical case with 2008 March 31st (start of visibility window) PA=127.4 degrees, 2008 June 15th (mid-window) PA=054.6 degrees, 2008 September 10th (end of visibility window) PA=333.7 degrees. The situation is effectively identical for other dates.
6.3. PA variation for a typical solar system object: Neptune's satellite Triton. Note how the PA variations over the course of a full observing window amount to less than 2 degrees. This makes it effectively impossible to accomodate map orientation or chopper angle avoidance constraints.
6.4. The background variation for Triton at 80 microns. The background is dominated at this wavelength by the Zodiacal Light contribution. As the elongation changes over the course of the observing window the background effectively doubles with time. At longer wavelength the ISM component will also change as the target moves across areas of different background. For objects relatively close to the Sun the ISM component may vary enormously in a comparatively short space of time.
6.5. The variation of the elongation of Io from the centre of Jupiter with time. The area in grey is the region when Io is either superimposed on the disk of Jupiter (in transit) or behind the disk of Jupiter (occulted). HSpot does not warn the user if visibility of a planetary satellite is limited in this way.
6.6. The variation in the offset of Io from the centre of Jupiter through an entire visibility window. The grey ellipse represents the approximate mean size of the disk of Jupiter. Note that the entire area of this plot is smaller than the field of view of either PACS or SPIRE. If requesting observations of a planetary satellite the observer should check the visibility of the satellite using the JPL Horizons program at the url: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi.

List of Tables

1.1. Herschel Spacecraft key characteristics
1.2. The Herschel Telescope's predicted characteristics at working temperature (70 K)
1.3. Nominal exclusion angles (half-cones) for observation towards major planets
1.4. Herschel pointing requirements (from SRS v3.2)
2.1. PACS and SPIRE confusion noise according to photometric and source density criteria. From [RD9]. It can be seen that for PACS and SPIRE's shortest wavelength, source density is the applicable criterion, while for SPIRE at longer wavelengths, the photometric criterion produces more realistic estimates.
4.1. Herschel mission key dates.
5.1. The main imaging capabilities of PACS and SPIRE. Please note that the wavelength range of detector sensitivity is approximate and the instrument sensitivities depend on the observing mode, so the values given are only orientative: please consult the relevant observing manual for more detailed values.
5.2. The main spectroscopic capabilities of PACS, SPIRE and HIFI. For more details please check the relevant instrument manual.