Tags:
create new tag
view all tags

Herschel pointing performance (current and past)

Absolute pointing accuracy (APE)

The present absolute pointing performance is measured as APE ~ 0.8 arcsec (1-sigma) since OD1011. Regarding the historical evolution, we can distinguish five different periods:

  1. From launch to OD320, where the star-tracker (STR) CCD temperature was lowered to avoid the effects of warm pixels in scan maps (the so-called 'speed bumps').
  2. From OD320 to OD762, the new (low) temperature setting had a negative impact on the S/C absolute pointing accuracy due to increased plate scale errors in STR1
  3. In OD762, a simple, 1D correction (i.e. the same linear correction factor in the Y and Z STR axes) was uploaded to the S/C ACMS.
  4. In OD866 an improved, 2D correction (different linear factors in the Y and Z axes) was made permament.
  5. In OD1011, a full STR FP distortion correction was made operational. Moreover, in OD1032 the STR catalogue was purged removing 73 "dubious" stars from the tracking list.

From launch to OD320

The most representative APE estimate was derived using PACS photometer point source observations during the Performance Verification (PV) Phase. A large set of observations (some 250) in six ODs (38, 64, 86, 92, 101 & 104) were used to derive the PACS photometer P01_0 aperture position and also the absolute pointing performance figure. In addition, a large pointing campaign was implemented in OD274 to determine the pointing performance depending on the STR interlacing (il) mode: il-disabled (up to 9 stars tracked at a time, at 2Hz sampling rate) and il-enabled from 15 to 18 stars sampled alternatively in two "planes", at 1Hz rate). The results are summarized below:

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{APE measurements (1$^{st}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab1} \begin{tabular}{||p{5cm}|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline OD 38-104 (250 meas.) & -- & -- &1.09 & 1.56 & 1.90 \\ OD 274 (all, 102 meas.) &  -0.45 & -1.71 &  1.23 &  1.51 & 1.94 \\ OD 274 (il-disab, 55 meas.) & -0.35 & -1.67 &  1.23 &  1.72 & 2.24 \\ OD 274 (il-enab, 47 meas.) & -0.57 & -1.75 &  0.93 &  1.22 & 1.53 \\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

Therefore, it is safe to assume APE ~ 1.9-2 arcsec for that period.

From OD320 to OD762

The event marking the onset of this long period is the lowering of the STR CCD reference temperature from 20 to -10 deg C. This was done to alleviate the effect of warm pixels when doing scan maps. The (in)famous speed bumps got corrected, but at the price of augmenting the STR plate scale errors that produced systematic but boresight-dependent offsets.

Shortly after the STR CCD temperature adjustment (OD385) we started to perform routine pointing calibration observations, performed within the daily telecommunications period (DTCP) allowed sky area, to verify the apertures' alignment and pointing performance. The plate scale errors translated into variations of the dispersion of the distribution of pointing calibration observations; nevertheless, the behaviour was not straightforward to explain: while in cycles 15-22, the APE was consistent with PV results, an outstanding increase was observed in cycles 23-31 and a decrease thereafter, as summarized in the table below:

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{APE measurements (2$^{nd}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab2} \begin{tabular}{||cc|c|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline Cycles & OD range & No. observations & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ &  &  & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline 15-22 & 385-496 & 45 & -0.83 & -0.17 & 0.85 & 1.80 & 1.99\\ 23-31 & 497-622 & 51 & -0.58 & -0.30 & 1.33 & 2.26 & 2.62\\ 32-36 & 623-692 & 40 & -0.08 & 0.19 & 1.05 & 2.03 & 2.28\\ 33-36 & 637-692 & 34 & -0.16  & 0.56 & 1.06 & 1.67 & 1.98\\ 37-39 & -- &  	22 & -0.01 & -0.58 & 1.10 & 1.19 & 1.62\\ -- & 731 & 17 & 0.27 & -0.57 & 1.12 & 2.05 & 2.33\\ -- & 733 & 21 & -0.62 & 0.55 & 1.28 & 2.65 &2.95\\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

An average of a large subset of observations in cycles 15-40 was performed (comprising nearly 200 observations). This is considered a representative value of the mean absolute accuracy achieved in this period. The largest outlier is at nearly 7 arcsec from the barycenter of the distribution, a value that is consistent with some extreme cases reported by observers:

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{average APE (2$^{nd}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab2} \begin{tabular}{||cc|c|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline Cycles & OD range & No. observations & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ &  &  & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline 15-40 & 385-733 & 196 & -0.40 & -0.13 & 1.17 & 2.05 & 2.36\\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

ape_all_str1.png

From OD762 to OD866 (STR1 1D correction)

A first on-board corrective action was performed in OD762, by up-loading a common (for both Y and Z axes) correction factor. The pointing performance was revisited in OD764 (42 pointing calibration observations), with very positive results, as shown below:

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{average APE (3$^{rd}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab3} \begin{tabular}{||cc|c|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline Cycles & OD range & No. observations & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ & &  & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline   & 764 & 42 & -0.26 & 0.90 & 0.92 & 1.12 & 1.45\\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

ape_od764.png

From OD866 to OD1010 (STR1 2D correction)

The 2D correction (i.e. separate correction factors to the Y and Z axes) was tested in DTCP858. The first assessment done by FDS was very positive. The pointing performance was verified in OD858 by means of of 43 pointing calibration observations, and the results pointed towards sub-arcsec accuracy; the change was made permanent in OD866. Subsequent checks pointed towards an APE around 1.1 arcsec.

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{average APE (4$^{th}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab4} \begin{tabular}{||cc|c|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline Cycles & OD range & No. observations & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ & &  & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline  & 858 & 43 & -0.27 & 0.54 & 0.70 & 0.65 & 0.95\\ 49-51 &  & 36 & -0.13 & 0.20 & 0.79 & 0.80 & 1.12\\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

ape_od858.png

ape_cycles49-51.png

Since OD1011 (full FP distortion correction)

The full STR FP distortion correction (8 polynomial coefficients per axis), computed by the PACS ICC became operational in OD1011, producing a further improvement in the performance, APE ≈ 0.8 – 0.9 arcsec.

In a third step (since OD1032), several (73) stars from the STR catalogue that were deemed by the PACS ICC as “dubious” due to positional uncertainties and/or high proper motions were removed from the tracking catalogue (the “tracking flag” was set to zero, and thus the stars can be used for acquisition but no longer for guiding), arriving to a final figure APE ≈ 0.8 arcsec, quite homogeneous across the sky (assuming that a sufficient number of tracking stars are available). This value can be used as a proxy of the current S/C absolute pointing accuracy.

Relative pointing accuracy (SRPE)

The relative pointing accuracy, as measured by the Spatial Relative Pointing Error (SRPE) has been only estimated for small raster maps (nodding observations with 52 arcsec throw). Nevertheless, even such a small size can yield representative SRPE results since the scale is larger than the usual STR bias stability range (some 10 arcsec). Only two estimates have been done at present:

  • At PV phase, it was measured for non-interlaced (baseline conditions) and interlaced (goal conditions) observations, yielding an estimate of 1.54 arcsec (baseline)/1.1 arcsec (goal)
  • A recent estimate has been performed (M. Nielbock, PACS ICC) using 43 pointing calibration observations gathered in OD858 (i.e. when the STR1 2D correction was tested), yielding a result of 1.02 arcsec (mixed interlaced & non-interlaced observations).

Other pointing figures

Absolute pointing error (APE) in scan maps

This figure was measured by means of 58 observations (towards 29 targets, at 70 and 110 tilt angle) in mini-map mode (leg length 3 arcmin, 2 legs, 4 arcsec separation). Each scan direction was processed independently. The images were drizzled with pixfrac=0.1.

All the observations were gathered between OD320 and OD762 (2nd period in the discussion above), so it is expected that the plate scale error effect has an impact on the results, that are on the other hand equivalent to those obtained using the PACS photometer point source mode, as shown below:

  \begin{table}[htdp] \caption{scan map APE (2$^{nd}$ period)} \begin{center} \label{ape_tab5} \begin{tabular}{||cc|c|c|c|c|c|c||} \hline\hline Cycles & OD range & No. observations & $\langle\Delta Y\rangle$ & $\langle\Delta Z\rangle$ & $\sigma_Y$&$\sigma_Z$& APE\\ & &  & (arcsec) & (arcsec) &(arcsec) & (arcsec) & (arcsec)\\ \hline  -- & -- & 29 & 0.38 & 0.77 & 1.24 & 2.01 & 2.36\\ \hline\hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}%

NEW New PACS-P mini-map measurements taken in cycles 64-71 (45 observations) confirm that, after the corrections applied to the on-board STR parameters, the Herschel scan map APE has substantially improved, and now a figure of ~1.1 arcsec can be considered as reference for such observations.

Relative pointing error (RPE)

The relative pointing error (RPE) or pointing stability (that measured on short periods of 1 minute) has been measured during PV phase and found to be below the requirement of 0.3 arcsec: RPE=0.189 arcsec for α Boo and RPE = 0.287 arcsec for the asteroid 19 Fortuna.

-- MiguelSanchez - 17 Aug 2012

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r8 < r7 < r6 < r5 < r4 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions
Topic revision: r8 - 2012-08-17 - MiguelSanchez
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl