Difference: HPDPDefinitionPage (7 vs. 8)

Revision 82015-06-23 - KatrinaExter

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="HSC.WebHome"

Herschel Highly Processed Data Product Page

Line: 40 to 40
 

PACS-S

Changed:
<
<
HPDP name Description Data Catalogue (tables) Images (PNGs, etc) Documentation (Readme, QSummary, etc)
Point-source calibrated data - case 1 SPG products processed through the dedicated point-source correction script for cases of centred point source Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? ??
Point-source calibrated data - case 2 SPG products processed through the dedicated point-source correction script for cases of non-centred point source Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? ??
Unchopped observations Baseline-subracted unchopped spectra Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? Must-have
Long range spectro flat-fielding Manual correction of the flat-fielding drift Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? Must-have
Red leak spectral range Run parallel pipeline that deals with red leak region (CalBlock+RSRF) and provide data stand-alone Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? Must-have
High flux source data ?? ?? No ?? ??
Repair of failed observations Re-run pipeline on observations set to failed Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? ??
Different wavelength regridding re-run SPG with different wavelength grid parameter for more rigourous noise computation Yes - level2.5 equivalent FITS files No ?? ??
Line list catalogue Spectral Feature catalogue No Yes - one file per obsid, and one concatenated file No ??
>
>
HPDP name Description Data Catalogue (tables) Images (PNGs, etc) Documentation (Readme, QSummary, etc) notes
Point-source calibrated data - case 1 SPG products processed through the dedicated point-source correction script for cases of centred point source Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Straightforward to do once the pipeline script has been fully validated and sources identified; validation is on-going
Point-source calibrated data - case 2 SPG products processed through the standard pipeline script for cases of centred point sources Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Aiming for SPG 14 in fact, so should be part of SPG rather than HPDP
Point-source calibrated data - case 3 SPG products processed through the standard pipeline script for cases of off-centred point sources Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   A possibility, difficult to identify, requires production of the uneven illumination correction task (which is on-going work)
Unchopped observations - case 1 Baseline-subtracted unchopped spectra Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Desirable, if case 2 is not possible this becomes Highly desirable
Unchopped observations - case 2 Improved transient correction and background subtraction Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Highly desirable, if it is possible to do this is preferred over case 1
Long range spectro flat-fielding Manual correction of the flat-fielding drift Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Must-have, however the aim is to have this as part of the SPG, and only those that still have problems would require manual correction
Red leak spectral range Run the specific pipeline that deals with red leak region (CalBlock+RSRF) and provide data stand-alone Yes - level2 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Must-have
High flux source data Very bright sources ought to be reduced with a difference pipeline script Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Some level of manual reduction may be necessary, but probably are not many such observations
Removing background contamination - case 1 chopNod mode Line and continuum Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Nice to have, depends on how possible it will be to identify these, would be manual reduction
Removing background contamination - case 2 unchopped mode Line and continuum Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Nice to have, easier to identify that for chopNod, but would here also be manual reduction
Repair of failed observations Re-run pipeline on observations set to failed Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Observations that are classed as failed but which will now run in SPG are easy to do and could become standard SPG, for others that require manual reduction they could also become the standard SPG, probably not difficult
Different wavelength regridding Re-run SPG with different wavelength grid parameter so the fluxes are no dependent and the noise characteristics not changed Yes - level2/2.5 equivalent FITS files No Yes   Has not been discussed by ICC yet, so whether this replaces SPG or is provided as an HPDP or done at all, has not yet been discussed
Line list catalogue Spectral Feature catalogue No Yes - one file per obsid, and one concatenated file No   dependent on available human resources
 

SPIRE-P

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl